Reply to comment:

Anonymous
<div class="content legacycomment"> <p> First of all, this IPv6 &quot;rating&quot; is good stuff imho! </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <p> Regarding the assessment for awarding the 5th star - I don't think the two mechanisms, as proposed, are mutually exclusive. My feeling is that it is perfectly OK to look at the source addresses of website visitors and match that up with the allocations. </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <p> The idea of publishing a &quot;ping6able&quot; address is attractive, technically and at first glance. Although - wearing my security hat for a moment - publishing such an address might attract DoS traffic? Caveat: 'I still have to read the draft, and it all depends on implementation </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <p> Talk to you soon regarding some other IPv6 measurement stuff ideas, </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <p> Wilfried </p> </div>