Interesting Graph - IPv6 per LIR

Emile Aben — Nov 22, 2011 02:05 PM
Contributors: Rene Wilhelm
Filed under: , ,
Often when looking at IPv6 deployment statistics, the size of the organisation or the network is not taken into account. In this article, we look at IPv6 deployment of Local Internet Registries (LIRs) per country in correlation with the size of the LIR.

When looking at IPv6 deployment at the LIR level, we can look at the following two metrics:

  • The percentage of LIRs that have IPv6 address space (currently at 47%) and;
  • What percentage of LIRs has IPv6 address space that is visible in the global routing table (currently at 29%).

What these numbers don't take into account is the sizes of the LIRs. For billing purposes, LIRs are divided into size categories based on the IP address space they hold and a number of other factors.  We used these size categories when producing statistics like https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/ipv6-ripeness-sorted-by-lirs-age-and-size. Taking this one step further, we can use the size of the LIRs as a weight to normalise deployment metrics. We took the total IPv4 address space held by an LIR as a good indication for the LIR’s size, and took a fresh look at IPv6 deployment metrics taking LIR size into account.

We can visualise this notion with "treemaps". Here each LIRs is represented as a rectangle. The size of the rectangle represents the size of the LIR (i.e. how much IPv4 address space the LIR holds), the colour of the rectangle represents if the LIR has IPv6 address space (Figure 1), and if (part of) that address space is routed (Figure 2). Green rectangles represent LIRs that have IPv6, and black the ones that don't have IPv6. In Figure 1 we also used darker green for LIRs of which we know they will receive IPv6 addresses from another LIR belonging to the same organisation. We found a couple of cases like this by manual inspection, and we're pretty sure there are more cases like this that we didn't catch.

Note: you can click on the images to enlarge them.


LIRs with IPv6 Address SpaceFigure 1: Treemap of LIRs with IPv6 address space. The green rectangles represent LIRs with IPv6 address space, while the black rectangles represent LIRs without IPv6 address space. A few rectangles are darker green and represent LIRs where we know that the organisation that holds these LIRs has another LIR that has IPv6 address space.

LIRs with routed IPv6 address spaceFigure 2: Treemap of LIRs with routed IPv6 address space. The green rectangles represent LIRs with IPv6 address space visible in global BGP, while the black rectangles represent LIRs that have IPv6 address space tat isn't yet  visible in global BGP.

(NOTE: due to a mix-up we had the same image showing twice here. At 2011-11-23 8:20 UTC the correct image for Figure 2 was added to this article)

If we look at this numerically we see is that 47% of LIRs have IPv6 address space, but if we weigh in the size of the LIR this becomes 81%. Or in other words: 81% of IPv4 address space in the RIPE NCC service region is held by an LIR that also holds IPv6 address space. Note: This doesn't take into account the organisations that have multiple LIRs where we see one of the other LIRs has IPv6 space (a few large ones in this class are coloured darker green in Figure 1).

Similarly, 29% of LIRs have one or more IPv6 prefixes visible in global BGP, as seen by our Routing Information System (RIS). When we apply the weighing this becomes 63%. In other words: 63% of IPv4 address space in the RIPE region is with an LIR that has IPv6 address space that is visible in global BGP.


LIRs
LIRs, weighted by IPv4 address space
Has IPv6 address space
47% 81%
Has routed IPv6 address space
29% 63%

Table 1: Difference between weighted and non-weighted metrics on IPv6 deployment.

Having 81% of IPv4 address space with LIRs that also took the first step in deploying IPv6 is an encouraging sign, but is in stark contrast with IPv6 deployment stats at end-users (0.39% according to Google, roughly 2% at www.ripe.net), or traffic stats (0.3% at AMS-IX). This shows that for a large majority of IPv4 address space in the RIPE NCC service region have taken the first steps, but the work towards full dual-stack deployment, and later IPv6-only, is far from finished.

3 Comments

Karine
Karine says:
Nov 22, 2011 04:22 PM
Hi Emile,
that is a very interesting chart!
Also makes one wonder which types of company/companies the black rectangles in FR, UK and IT represent...
Emile Aben
Emile Aben says:
Nov 23, 2011 08:36 AM
Hi Karine,
I looked at the top 10 LIRs that don't have any IPv6 address space delegated from us, and the top industries for these are: 'isp broadband', and 'telecom NONE' (both 7 out of 10 LIRs). In our systems LIRs can self-select the industries they are in from a list of categories, which is where these labels come from.
Hervé
Hervé says:
Nov 22, 2011 08:22 PM
Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Only plain text is possible. Web and email addresses will be transformed into clickable links. Comments are moderated so they won't appear immediately.

Navigation
Related Items
Modifications to the IP Analyser to Reflect New Policy

We are in the process of implementing the policy regarding Post Depletion Adjustment of Procedures ...

Report on IPv6 Security Test Methodology

The Dutch Institute for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) and a number of Dutch security companies ...

Visualising Bandwidth Capacity and Network Activity in RIPEstat Using M-Lab Data

As a result of the cooperation between the RIPE NCC and Measurement Lab (M-Lab), you can now ...

RIPEstat 2013 Year in Review

RIPEstat users saw a lot of changes throughout 2013, from support for new query types, such as ...

Internet Disruptions in Sudan

Significant Internet disruptions are happening in Sudan, possibly as a reaction to riots. We use ...

more ...