Marco Hogewoning

The 2012 IPv6 CPE Survey

Marco Hogewoning
Contributors: Susannah Gray
0 You have liked this article 0 times.

In response to a huge amount of demand, the RIPE NCC has conducted another survey on the level of IPv6 support for various vendor's Customer Premises Equipment (CPE). The questions in the 2012 focused around the most common access technologies. The results have been published using a simple colour coded matrix, listing which features are present, on the roadmap or not available. We've also developed a new interactive user interface so you're now able to filter the results and compare different models. This article will highlight some of the 2012 findings as well as some comparison to previous editions of the survey.


The first IPv6 Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) Survey was released in June 2010 and found a home here on RIPElabs. The actual work on the survey, however, started far earlier, back in 2008. It soon became clear that CPE was a very hot topic for the technical community and so we decided to update the CPE Survey matrix

The 2012 Survey

Over time we've learned one key lesson: it's almost impossible to fully determine whether a specific feature is operating as expected or not. Too many external factors and differences in the definitions makes it really hard to put concrete values on things. User reports and trying to determine if features were indeed working was probably the most controversial part of the previous surveys.

Although several people offered their help, both with manpower and equipment, we decided to skip the tests. It's impossible to test every single combination and we also didn't want to duplicate work; projects like  KATR and the wiki already do a great job collecting user feedback and test results.

So, for the 2012 survey, we asked the vendors to list what is available and what is planned for the future.

How to use it

The survey can be used as a buying guide to find out which models might suit your needs. Get a few of the models you like and test them in your own network, using the access technology and transitioning method you choose.

We know that for a home user "getting a few" is not a solution. If you are looking at the survey to find a router for your home setup, consult your service provider on the features you need. When you buy one, make arrangements with the shop, so that you can return the device in case it turns out that it doesn't suit your needs.

You can select which models from which vendor and which features you want to compare in the new interactive interface. You can also view the overall matrix which contains all the results.

Regional Availability

People from all over the world have shown interest in this work. At the same time we noticed differences in the level of IPv6 support based on where you buy a certain device. So we asked the participants to indicate in which region certain models are available. In making this a selectable item, we hope to have added a valuable new feature to the survey interface. Some vendors have the same model available globally, others show large differences between the models available in different parts of the world. See below a part of the IPv6 CPE table showing regional availability:

IPv6 CPE - Regional Availability Figure 1: IPv6 CPE Survey 2012 - Regional Availability

Comparing the results

When we first started the CPE survey work, there were hardly any consumer grade devices available and what was there was often still in the early stages of development. Today, most of the major vendors offer multiple devices that come with IPv6 enabled by default, straight out of the box.

And although the number of networks that offer IPv6 is still fairly small, we see more and more network operators announcing plans to deploy IPv6 or who are already doing small scale consumer testing. This also helps a lot in telling the manufacturers where to focus their developments. At the same time it helps other operators in choosing a particular provisioning method or access technology.

IPv6 transition technologies

With APNIC and the RIPE NCC already allocating address space from their last /8s, the 2012 CPE Survey was conducted in a different environment to the previous surveys and a lot of people have asked about CPE support for transitioning technologies.

We didn’t include any of these transitioning technologies in this survey. We strongly believe that a full and native deployment of IPv6 should be the goal. Providing people access without any dependency on other protocols like IPv4 is the most important. No matter which intermediate solution you deploy. Make sure it is future proof. That also goes for the CPE you pick, make sure you can turn off IPv4 at some point in time.

The other and even more important reason is that we did not want to overload the survey. There are just too many options to include them all and none of them has become really dominant. In other words, we don’t have clear picture of what exactly we should ask. You can find more information about current transition mechanisms on .

Wireless Technology

The same goes for wireless. In the past, a lot of people asked us to include LTE and 3G devices. While we see a definite move towards IPv6 on such devices in the last few months, we feel it is too early to list them. Only a few networks today support IPv6 and developments in the industry are so fast, that by the time we published the first survey, a lot of the information may be outdated.


The conclusion can be short: “CPE that support IPv6 are available from multiple sources”. And while we don’t list them in the survey we have also seen various proprietary models that now support IPv6. The message is clear: there's now no excuse not to deploy IPv6.

The real challenge comes now as people have to buy and install CPE and replace the millions of devices that are already out there and which are fast becoming obsolete.

The IPv6 CPE Survey 2012 can be accessed via the IPv6 Act Now website,

See below a screenshot of the main survey page.

IPv6 CPE Survey - Front Page Figure 2: IPv6 CPE Survey 2012 - Front Page


As with the previous surveys, your feedback is important. Tell us what you think and which questions or features we should include in any future versions of this survey.

We also would like invite all manufacturers to participate in this project. If you haven’t been contacted by the RIPE NCC yet, please contact us via and we will send you the questionnaire and information on how to get your equipment listed.

0 You have liked this article 0 times.

You may also like

View more

About the author

Marco Hogewoning is acting Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance with the RIPE NCC. As part of the External Relations department, he helps lead the RIPE NCC's engagement with membership, the RIPE community, government, law enforcement and other Internet stakeholders. Marco joined the RIPE NCC in 2011, working for two years in the Training Services team. Prior to joining the RIPE NCC, he worked as a Network Engineer for various Dutch Internet Service Providers. As well as designing and operating the networks, he was also involved in running the Local Internet Registries. During 2009 and 2010, Marco worked on introducing native IPv6 as a standard service on the XS4ALL DSL network. In November 2010, this project was awarded a Dutch IPv6 award. More recently, he has contributed to the MENOG / RIPE NCC IPv6 Roadshow, a hands-on training initiative in the Middle East. Marco has been involved with the RIPE community since 2001 and was involved with various policy proposals over that period. In February 2010, he was appointed by the RIPE community as one of the RIPE IPv6 Working Group Co-Chairs.

Comments 7